A child is born, has no idea whatsoever of this human dominated world. He learns gradually to speak, to crawl, to walk, to run, and then adapts himself to this world characterized by vicious circle of life and death. Was it necessary for him to adapt?
Every person on this planet, let it be George W. Bush of USA or a poor native of Sudan, Africa or the world's richest Bill Gates, goes through the same initial stages and is born with naked body, knowledge, and perceptions.
Where are the differences then? What is it that causes the 2P's of the small child- Psychology and Philosophy to change and being different from other children of his age. Is it a biological phenomenon (inherited from parents) or characterized by the child's perceptions of this world or a child's development of the brain.
This is an important question to answer as most of the 3D's of this world- disparities, diversities and deviations arise from the difference in 2P's of different persons. No two persons are alike in this world (ignoring the concept of anti-matter) and as such no two persons have the same P's towards life. This is really a unique attribute and accountability of a person.
Difference in psychologies leads to difference in perceptions and that's why we meet different people with different opinions having distinct characters.
In such a scenario, I would be traumatized to ascertain whether a particular way of life is good, bad or desirable. As such it becomes really difficult to differentiate between good and bad, desirable and undesirable. What may be good to one- may be least accepted by some other. So, assuming common views held by majority of people, most of the human beings in this universe live in the gray area in between. As such the purpose of this life becomes questionable!
Is this life the survival of the fittest as proposed once by Charles Darwin where everyone is fighting it out to grab their pie amongst others to ultimately lose it and let it be consumed by his successors. Or is it an illusion- luring us into this materialistic world where we are born to die! Who should actually be then called an "accomplisher" in life? It really becomes difficult to answer.
Money- It's a piece of paper with some value attached to it by the human beings. It is created by man, consumed by man (not directly of course) and then replenished by man. Then, what for hell do we spend our whole lives in earning a few bucks to ultimately lose them.
In view of all of this, there is an urgent need for all of us to re-look into our P's of life (unbiased attitude) and see that these are entirely our own and not influenced by others. (Technique called self-analysis) I am sure the answers will surely come up. Try it out!
4 comments:
I am impressed and confused too. I would never be able to write this kinda stuff whole of my life and i know it will be useless to try as well. I will only be able to write chetan bhagat kinda stuff at my blog. If this post is your original work then dude you rock. It seemed that i am reading something written by Kurian. Imust say a wonderful post to start with. About money...Whatever you say about it but ultimately you will also end up finishing your own life in trying to earn more money....
and have you clicked this pic from 6630?
Just trying to answer some of your questions.The stuff you have written is really good.
The purpose of everybody's life in this world is to achieve happiness.The ways are different,the priorities are different.
I truly agree,what may be good to one-may be least accepted by some other.
To be happy with the best is very common.The one,who can be happy in his/her worst time is the true accomplisher,i think.
I agree with you on the last line although it rarely happens with most of the people around. Well said!
Post a Comment